[PCA] Fw: [Pollinator] Roads and pollinators - again

Lewis_Gorman at fws.gov Lewis_Gorman at fws.gov
Wed Aug 30 17:40:31 CDT 2006


It's hard to believe that managing Interstate and limited access highways, 
clover leaves, etc. by merely not mowing them (except for safety 
requirements) would not be of overall advantage to all wildlife.  Is a 
study really required to determine an overall benefit?  Increased 
biodiversity alone should justify supporting a reduced mowing policy on 
highway lands.
There must be millions of acres being mowed at great cost, petroleum 
energy use, and associated air pollution that would be significantly 
reduced by halting mowing, except as minimally required by federal highway 
safety specifications. 

Lew Gorman
FWS-WO




Patricia_DeAngelis at fws.gov 
Sent by: native-plants-bounces at lists.plantconservation.org
08/30/2006 10:21 AM

To
native-plants at lists.plantconservation.org
cc

Subject
[PCA] Fw: [Pollinator] Roads and pollinators - again







A conversation occurring over another list that some of you may find 
interesting and may want to provide input on ( to the person who sent the 
e-mail).   

Patricia S. De Angelis, Ph.D.
Botanist - Division of Scientific Authority
Chair - Plant Conservation Alliance - Medicinal Plant Working Group
US Fish & Wildlife Service
4401 N. Fairfax Dr., Suite 750
Arlington, VA  22203
703-358-1708 x1753
FAX: 703-358-2276
Working for the conservation and sustainable use of our green natural 
resources.
<www.nps.gov/plants/medicinal>

----- Forwarded by Patricia De Angelis/ARL/R9/FWS/DOI on 08/30/2006 10:18 
AM ----- 
Lucy_Jordan at fws.gov 
08/28/2006 01:12 PM 






Subject
[Pollinator] Roads and pollinators - again









With respect to the various comments I am getting, specifically from Chip
Taylor, is anyone doing studies to determine whether roadside refugia
serve as  sources or sinks for pollinator or beneficial insect 
populations,
given the inevitable mortality?  It would be helpful to know whether the
mortality is more than compensated by fecundity.  It would also be helpful
to associate that with road capacity/size and traffic use and patterns.

Also, we need to know which ROW management practices help or hurt species.
For example, many roadways here in Utah are mowed in late June or early
July.  Is that ok?  Or does not increase mortality, cause loss of
reproductive output, make habitat unsuitable?

On another note, if we improve these areas for pollinators, does that
result in an increase in mortality of birds that might use the habitat or
might feed on the insects?

Roads are really lethal.  We need to know whether, and under what
conditions, it is beneficial or detrimental to manage them for wildlife.

Lucy


Dr. Lucy A. Jordan
Fish & Wildlife Biologist
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Utah Ecological Services Office
2369 W. Orton Circle (2300 South), Suite 50
West Valley City, Utah 84119
Phone:     (801) 975-3330
Fax:         (801) 975-3331
email:       lucy_jordan at fws.gov

Experience is that marvelous thing that enables you to recognize a mistake
when you make it again.

____________________________________________________________
native-plants mailing list
native-plants at lists.plantconservation.org
http://lists.plantconservation.org/mailman/listinfo/native-plants_lists.plantconservation.org


Disclaimer
Posts on this list reflect only the opinion of the individual who is 
posting the message; they are not official opinions or positions of the 
Plant Conservation Alliance.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.plantconservation.org/pipermail/native-plants_lists.plantconservation.org/attachments/20060830/aaf88e9c/attachment.html>


More information about the native-plants mailing list