[MPWG] AHPA Submits Comments on Special Forest Products and Proposed Fees

Michael McGuffin mmherbal at ca.rr.com
Sun Jan 27 09:08:45 CST 2008


Hi,

The comments that AHPA filed were not to this proposed Alaska state rule but
to a federal rule proposed by the USDA Forest Service.

 

Much of the points that you make about the need for a more active and
participatory citizenry are nonetheless relevant.

 

Michael McGuffin

AHPA

 

  _____  

From: mpwg-bounces at lists.plantconservation.org
[mailto:mpwg-bounces at lists.plantconservation.org] On Behalf Of
cafesombra at aol.com
Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2008 4:28 AM
To: MPWG at lists.plantconservation.org; dnrmlw at dnr.state.ak.us;
joe.joyner at alaska.gov
Subject: Re: [MPWG] AHPA Submits Comments on Special Forest Products and
Proposed Fees

 

Hello,






Glad to see that AHPA was able to submit comments for this.  I wish that
this list had more of a roll in discussion.  To me, the following
announcement appeared to be relevant to Alaska.  Sorry, but frankly as most
people do I often scan emails and this one had Alaska written all over it.
Since it is calling for revisions to the Alaska Administrative Code and
comments were to be sent to DNR in Alaska, excuse me but, if public comment
were really important to DNR on this matter, it might have been valuable to
make it more clear that this rule affects collection in the lower 49 states.
Here in PA when I called the Forest Service to ask how to request permission
to harvest teaberry, black cohosh and aralia on a recently clearcut large
piece of state forest land I was connected to four different people who did
not know procedure, was told they'd find out and call back, and never heard
back from them.  Granted this was state land not national forest land.  None
the less, DNR might want to think about more effective public outreach (even
though public comment is such a nuisance) and might also want to do some
outreach to their state siblings.  Democracy may be a bit quicker without
including everyone but then, that isn't really the point, is it?  At any
rate, glad some of the people got to put their two cents in.  Perhaps next
time this list could work openly on a participatory democratic process of
discussion and accord, and submit a group comment.  Even if we never reached
a point of agreement, it might inspire a few more citizens to throw some
cents into the mix. So long as people are not too busy and important for
participatory democracy, it would be nice to give it a chance to work. 













The following is the public notice regarding these proposed regulation 






changes: 






NOTICE OF PROPOSED CHANGES IN THE






REGULATIONS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES













The Department of Natural Resources (DNR) is proposing to add new 






regulations and revise others concerning the use of state lands for the 






commercial harvest of non-timber forest products (NTFPs).  DNR proposes to 






adopt regulation changes in Title 11 of the Alaska Administrative Code, 






specifically 11 AAC 96.030 dealing with the Applications for a land use 






permit. The Department of Natural Resources also proposes to adopt new 






regulations in Title 11 of the Alaska Administrative Code, specifically 11 






AAC 05.010(a) and (e) dealing with the Fees,  11 AAC 96.035 dealing with 






the Commercial Harvest of non-timber forest products and 11 AAC 96.250 






dealing with definitions. 






The revised regulations include the following: 






refunds of annual use fees for land use permits






requirements for applications for land use permits













The new regulations include the following: 






establishes an application and minimum permit fee for commercial harvest 






permit for non-timber forest products,






establishes permit harvest fees for the commercial harvest of non-timber 






forest products,






establishes a permitting process, standards and conditions for the 






issuance of permits for the commercial harvest of non-timber forest 






products,






defines terms used in the issuance and management of permits for the 






commercial harvest of non-timber forest products.













The proposed regulation additions and changes are necessary to establish a 






sustainable commercial harvest program for limited amounts of non-timber 






forest products on state lands and to ensure that the public interest is 






served in the commercial harvest of these materials. 






You may comment on the proposed regulations, including the potential costs 






to private persons of complying with the proposed changes, by submitting 






written comments to the Division of Mining, Land and Water, 550 W. 7th 






Avenue, Suite 1070, Anchorage, AK 99501-3579 or by e-mail to 






dnrmlw at dnr.state.ak.us
<http://lists.plantconservation.org/mailman/listinfo/mpwg_lists.plantconserv
ation.org>   or by fax to 907-269-8904.  The comments must be 






received by the department no later than 5:00 p.m. on Friday, on January 






4, 2008. 






If you are a person with a disability who needs a special accommodation in 






order to participate in this process, please contact Joseph Joyner at 






269-8511 no later than December 21, 2007, to ensure that any necessary 






accommodations can be provided.






For more information or a copy of the proposed regulation changes, go to 






http://www.dnr.state.ak.us/mlw/hottopics/, or write to the Director's 






Office, Division of Mining, Land and Water, Department of Natural 






Resources, Attention Joseph Joyner, 550 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 1070, 






Anchorage, Alaska 99501-3579; or call 907-269-8511, or email at   






Joe.Joyner at alaska.gov
<http://lists.plantconservation.org/mailman/listinfo/mpwg_lists.plantconserv
ation.org>  . 






After the public comment period ends, the Department of Natural Resources 






will either adopt these or other provisions dealing with the same subject, 






without further notice, or decide to take no action on them.  The language 






of the final regulations may be different from that of the proposed 






regulations.  You should comment during the time allowed if your interests 






could be affected.






Statutory Authority:   AS 38.05.020; AS 38.05.035; AS 38.05.850; 






Statutes Being Implemented, Interpreted, or Made Specific:   AS 38.05.020; 






AS 38.05.035; AS 38.05.850;






Fiscal Information:  The proposed regulation changes are not expected to 






require an increased appropriation.







 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Karen Robin <KRobin at ahpa.org>
To: mpwg at lists.plantconservation.org
Sent: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 1:14 pm
Subject: [MPWG] AHPA Submits Comments on Special Forest Products and
Proposed Fees

AHPA Submits Comments on Special Forest Products and Proposed Fees

 

(January 25, 2008) - The American Herbal Products Association (AHPA) has
submitted comments to the USDA Forest Service in response to that agency's
proposed rule governing the sale and disposal of nontimber forest products
that are harvested on National Forest System lands. The proposed rule, which
was issued last October, sets requirements for the Forest Service to monitor
such harvests and ensure that they occur at sustainable levels, and
establishes programs for collection of fees from harvesters.  

 

"Our National Forests and National Grasslands provide many commercially
valuable plants to the trade," said AHPA President Michael McGuffin. "AHPA
and its members are committed to sustainable use of our plant resources and
we applaud the Forest Service for its management efforts. We are also
supportive of reasonable fees that can be used to manage those resources,
but those fees must be established at levels that do not disrupt the income
of individual collectors and other small businesses that are engaged in
sustainable harvest operations." 

 

Among its comments to the Forest Service, AHPA suggested that fees for
harvested forest products be calculated at the point of harvest, rather than
further along the distribution or value-added chain, and that these fees
should be 3 percent of each product's value at the point of harvest. AHPA
also suggested that existing resources should be used in both monitoring and
pricing activities. These include AHPA's tonnage surveys, the AHPA/AHP Good
Agricultural and Collection Practice for Herbal Raw Materials(1), and the
ISSC-MAP(2).

 

The Federal Register notice for the Forest Service's proposed rule can be
downloaded at:
http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20071800/edocket.access.gpo.gov
/2007/pdf/E7-20658.pdf.

 

AHPA's comments are available are at:
http://www.ahpa.org/Portals/0/pdfs/08_0122_AHPAComments_USFS.pdf.

 

 

Notes:

1) Jointly published in December 2006 by AHPA and the American Herbal
Pharmacopoeia, this document is available at
http://www.ahpa.org/portals/0/pdfs/06_1208_AHPA-AHP_GACP.pdf.

2) International Standards for Sustainable wild Collection of Medicinal and
Aromatic Plants, available at
http://www.floraweb.de/proxy/floraweb/MAP-pro/Standard_Version1_0.pdf

 

 








_______________________________________________






PCA's Medicinal Plant Working Group mailing list






MPWG at lists.plantconservation.org






http://lists.plantconservation.org/mailman/listinfo/mpwg_lists.plantconserva
tion.org













To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to MPWG-request at lists.plantconservation.org
with 






the word "unsubscribe" in the subject line.






                                                       






Disclaimer                                                                






Any advice given on this list regarding diagnosis or treatments etc.
reflects 






ONLY the opinion of the individual who posts the message. The information 






contained in posts is not intended nor implied to be a substitute for 






professional medical advice relative to your specific medical condition or 






question. All medical and other healthcare information that is discussed on
this 






list should be carefully reviewed by the individual reader and their
qualified 






healthcare professional. Posts do not reflect any official opinions or
positions 






of the Plant Conservation Alliance.














  _____  

size=2 width="100%" align=center> 

More new features than ever. Check out the new AOL Mail
<http://o.aolcdn.com/cdn.webmail.aol.com/mailtour/aol/en-us/text.htm?ncid=ao
lcmp00050000000003> !

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.plantconservation.org/pipermail/mpwg_lists.plantconservation.org/attachments/20080127/39d2c973/attachment.html>


More information about the MPWG mailing list