[MPWG] MPWG:Transparency
DianeDonCarlos at aol.com
DianeDonCarlos at aol.com
Tue Dec 7 13:22:22 CST 2004
I am a "lurker" on this list, but had to jump in. Many good comments and
thoughts re: organic. But isn't the issue transparency?
The USDA created a lengthy definition of, and then trademarked the word
"organic." The "rule" is contained in 7 CFR (Federal Register) part 205 and reads
for 136 pages if you include what I call the pre-ramble and the post scripts.
The actual definition is contained in 25 pages. The National Organic Program is
administered by the Agricultural Marketing Service which is an agency of the
USDA. If I CHOSE to label my product with the word "organic" I must purchase
the use of the word from the USDA according to the NOP definition and have my
product inspected and my label approved. Hence the cost and the paperwork. The
discussion re: farming/subsidies/poverty, fair trade, organic vs.
conventional, standardized vs. whole plant, wildcrafted vs. cultivated, etc. etc. is all
important, but I think missing the value of the NOP for the issues facing the
herbal products industry. The document is a model for ensuring transparency, in
this case to the "organic" standard. But any standard could be applied.
Certified Organic products by NOP definition carry transparency from seed to
shelf. All points in the growing, production, transport, processing, and
labeling are inspected. Certified Organic on the label is the only single
certification/seal to my knowledge which affords this level of transparency. As a
consumer, I tend towards the Certified Organic label because it affords me that
transparency, regardless of whether I feel I want "organic" or not.
Certified Organic herbal products may be from cultivated and/or wild crafted
raw materials. Either way the certification dictates that the raw material is
not genetically modified, and is grown and processed organically. If the raw
material is wild harvested, the stand must be "sustainably harvested". The
official definition reads not destructive to the environment and will sustain the
growth and production of the wild crop. OK, much room here for refinement. I
can hear all the comments re: the NOP sustainable definition-clearly the
inspector must know something about the wild crop, and do we even really KNOW how
much C. racemosa, for example, can be harvested in a single stand and meet the
definition? But remember that the wild crafting standards are within the
guidelines of the larger rule. All other definitions apply re: seed, soil,
production, processing, labeling, transport etc. AND record keeping. If I was
inspecting a wild crafter I would have to see........actually touch and smell and
inspect........each specific area where the raw material was taken. And the
associated permission/permits from the landowner, and then have to verify that the
soil was free of prohibited substances for 3 years etc. etc. It is quite a
probe!!
I have been inspecting organics for three years now. Everything from wild
harvested NTFP's to salsa to baby food to soybeans. I meet yuppies, hippies,
profiteers, off-the-grid barefoot folks in poverty, Quality Control Managers in
suits, split operations growing organic and conventional side by side, and
everything in between. What I ALWAYS find, or rather demand, is transparency. If I
don't find it, the producer is cited for noncompliance and is unlikely to be
certified. The system works, and I think it is a GREAT model for ensuring
transparency.
And it is voluntary. Remember you are paying for the use of the word, with
it's USDA regulated definition. Anyone can grow food for themselves and others
in any way they chose. Much the same as you can make moccasins for yourself
and others. You just can't label them NIKE if NIKE doesn't say it's OK.
Diane Don Carlos
Herbalist, Organic Inspector
Sweet Farm
33735 Beech Grove Road
Rutland, OH 45775
740-742-1714
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.plantconservation.org/pipermail/mpwg_lists.plantconservation.org/attachments/20041207/2fced48a/attachment.html>
More information about the MPWG
mailing list