[APWG] proposal to speed listing injurious species: US fish and wildlife service

Mon Jul 15 08:27:02 CDT 2013

No, that is not what it means.

'Under federal law (the Lacey Act), the Service can "prescribe by regulation those wild mammals, wild birds, fish, mollusks, crustaceans, amphibians and
reptiles, and the offspring or eggs of any of the aforementioned, that are injurious to human beings, or to the interests of agriculture,
horticulture, or forestry, or to the wildlife or wildlife resources of the United States." '

That means FWS has to do the public process to add to the regulation as normal.  The Catex is for NEPA, thus they would be exempted from the need to do an Environmental Assessment or Impact statement for doing the regulatory process for the taxa to be regulated.

Alan V. Tasker, Ph.D.
Senior Regulatory Policy Specialist
USDA  Animal & Plant Health Inspection Service
Plant Protection & Quarantine
Regulations, Permits & Manuals;
Plants for Planting Import & Policy Staff
4700 River Road, 4A03.18
Riverdale, MD 20737

Alan.V.Tasker at aphis.usda.gov<mailto:Alan.V.Tasker at aphis.usda.gov>

Desk     301-851-2224 Mobile 301-346-7207
Fax        301-734-8584

http://www.aphis.usda.gov/import_export/plants/plant_imports/Q37/nappra/index.shtml

Subscribe to the PPQ Stakeholder registry at: https://public.govdelivery.com/accounts/USDAAPHIS/subscriber/new

From: APWG [mailto:apwg-bounces at lists.plantconservation.org] On Behalf Of Robert Layton Beyfuss
Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2013 7:13 PM
To: John; apwg at lists.plantconservation.org
Subject: Re: [APWG] proposal to speed listing injurious species: US fish and wildlife service

So, some nameless bureaucrat(s) at USFW gets to decide what is injurious or not, without any review process at all? All in the name of expediency?  Sounds like the Patriot Act for animals.

________________________________
From: APWG [apwg-bounces at lists.plantconservation.org] on behalf of John [jmbarr at academicplanet.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 12:13 AM
To: apwg at lists.plantconservation.org<mailto:apwg at lists.plantconservation.org>
Subject: [APWG] proposal to speed listing injurious species: US fish and wildlife service

 Herp digest sent this along.  If you are interested or concerned with stopping non-native invasives BEFORE they reach the shores, then this should interest you.
john in austin

Proposal Seeks to Improve the Listing Process for Injurious Species, Says U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Press Release 7/1/13--A quick response to preventing harmful species from entering the United States and crossing state lines is the intent behind today's proposal by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) to refine the environmental review process when listing species as injurious wildlife.

The Service is proposing an exemption known as a "categorical exclusion" that would generally preclude the need for preparing an environmental
assessment under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) for the action of listing species as "injurious."   Injurious species can spread
quickly across the U.S. landscape, potentially harming native wildlife and their habitats as well as human activities. For example, the injurious
zebra mussel, a tiny but prolific invertebrate from Eurasia, can clog water intake cooling pipes, shutting down some electric power plants in the
United States.

Under federal law (the Lacey Act), the Service can "prescribe by regulation those wild mammals, wild birds, fish, mollusks, crustaceans, amphibians and
reptiles, and the offspring or eggs of any of the aforementioned, that are injurious to human beings, or to the interests of agriculture,
horticulture, or forestry, or to the wildlife or wildlife resources of the United States." A species designated as injurious would then be prohibited
from being imported into the United States or transported across state lines.  Currently, the listing process can take several years because it
includes many steps, in particular a review under NEPA that includes a rather lengthy environmental assessment. During this time, a species that
could have been stopped entering the United States or a crossing a state line could become irreversibly invasive.

All the environmental assessments the Service has prepared to date have concluded that the action of listing the species as injurious would have no
significant effect on the human and natural environment. This is because the listing action helps keep species out of the United States that are not
naturally found here or helps prevent the spread of injurious wildlife into new areas within the country where they are not naturally found, thus
having no effect on the environment.

In a notice appearing in today's *Federal Register*, the Service proposes a process that would generally require an abbreviated review for the
regulatory action that places a species on a federal list of injurious species. This categorical exclusion, if finalized, will help streamline the
process intended to keep out injurious species or to prevent their spread across state lines.

The *Federal Register* notice opens a 30-day public comment period ending on July 31, 2013. The notice can be found at
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-07-01/pdf/2013-15707.pdf . You can find more information on this categorical exclusion at
http://www.fws.gov/injuriouswildlife/catex .

Contact: Susan Jewell-703/358-2416-Susan_jewell at fws.gov<mailto:Susan_jewell at fws.gov>

Laury Parramore-703/358-2541-Laury_parramore at fws.gov<mailto:Laury_parramore at fws.gov>
____________________________________________________________

This electronic message contains information generated by the USDA solely for the intended recipients. Any unauthorized interception of this message or the use or disclosure of the information it contains may violate the law and subject the violator to civil or criminal penalties. If you believe you have received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete the email immediately.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.plantconservation.org/pipermail/apwg_lists.plantconservation.org/attachments/20130715/4a5ffee9/attachment.html>