[APWG] Terminology still unresolved? Re: Jewelweed

Tue Jul 19 13:36:58 CDT 2011

JewelweedHello all,

Is there anyone who acknowledges (or would it be simpler to say "does not acknowledge") that there is at least a phenomenological difference between "alien" species that are largely restricted to disturbed sites and those which "invade" healthy ecosystems? 

I realize that some of the terminology used here is debatable too, and such discussion are worth having, but it would appear, if "invasion ecology" is to be taken seriously as a sub-discipline of ecology, that clarity of terminology is vital to clear communication. Time was, colonization referred to any movement of an organism into a "new" location, plants (what about animals?) that were restricted to disturbed areas were termed "ruderal," and "alien" organisms that colonized healthy/undisturbed ecosystems were called "invasive." 

It appears that some believe there is no distinction. I would appreciate any correction, definitions, or suggestions that will bring discipline to communication about these subjects. 

WT

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Wayne Vanderploeg 
  To: Maze, Dominic ; Katie Fite ; apwg at lists.plantconservation.org 
  Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 10:24 AM
  Subject: Re: [APWG] Jewelweed

  Hello All, 

  I don't usually make comment to this group....I generally browse this list to see what new issues are popping up.  As a biologist/ecologist/naturalist/land manager for 31 years in the Chicago area with the Forest Preserve District of Cook County, I have seen this plant come and go.  Deer do browse it heavily and tend to prefer it over most other plants.  It does well in disturbed areas where the soil is rich, moist and semi shaded.  I have always viewed it as sensitive plant that is easily displaced by weeds and never thought of it as a problem plant in the Chicago area.  The fact that it is spreading prolifically in other areas where it typically does not occur could be a symptom of a bigger problem.  I would expect it to disappear when those problems are discovered and solved.  

  Wayne Vanderploeg

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  From: "Maze, Dominic" <Dominic.Maze at portlandoregon.gov>
  To: Katie Fite <katie at westernwatersheds.org>; "apwg at lists.plantconservation.org" <apwg at lists.plantconservation.org>
  Sent: Tue, July 19, 2011 11:42:18 AM
  Subject: Re: [APWG] Jewelweed

  Hi Katie et alia,

     Impatiens capensis is, in my experience, a problematic species here west of the Cascade Range in the Pacific NW.  The densities of this sp. are pretty amazing with the understory of riparian corridors often dominated by it.  I’ve been seeing more and more of it in the Willamette Valley and surrounding ranges here in Oregon with seemingly little attention paid to it.

     Interestingly, some land managers still consider this species native here on the West Coast, probably due to confusion with our native, I. ecalcarata in some older floras and field guides.  Ed Alverson of TNC wrote a short comment in reply to a posting on I. capensis at the Botany Photo of the Day website:

  “Impatiens capensis is an introduced and invasive species in the Pacific Northwest , west of the Cascades. Peter Zika addressed this issue in a 2006 paper, "The status of Impatiens capensis (Balsaminaceae) on the
  Pacific Northwest coast", published in the Journal of the Torrey Botanical Club, vol. 133 pp. 593-600. In fact, I. capensis is spreading into the habitats of the uncommon native I. ecalcarata west of the Cascades, and the two species are hybridizing. This has created a situation where the native species is potentially being out-competed by both the introduced species and by their hybrids. Zika has published another paper on the hybrid, which he has named Impatiens x pacifica , see "Impatiens x pacifica (Balsaminaceae), a New Hybrid jewelweed from the Pacific Northwest Coast of North America", Novon vol. 16, pp. 443-448, 2006.”

  Add this spp. to I. glandulifera (a big problem) and I. balfourii (an escaping species which may be a problem in the future), and we’ve got our hands full out here with the touch-me-nots.

  Dominic Maze | Invasive Species Coordinator 

  City of Portland Environmental Services

  1120 SW 5th Avenue, Room 1000

  Portland, Oregon 97204

  p:  (503) 823-4899

  f:   (503) 823-5344

  dominic.maze at portlandoregon.gov

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  From: apwg-bounces at lists.plantconservation.org [mailto:apwg-bounces at lists.plantconservation.org] On Behalf Of Katie Fite
  Sent: Monday, July 18, 2011 5:46 PM
  To: apwg at lists.plantconservation.org
  Subject: [APWG] Jewelweed

  Has anyone had any experience with jewelweed (Impatiens) native to the eastern U. S. becoming weedy in valley marsh habitats in the intermountain West? 

  I see that jewelweed Impatiens capensis (orange jewelweed) is listed as a King County  (WA) “Weed of Concern”. 

  This species is shown as having a yellow flowered form, which is what we are seeing.

  http://www.kingcounty.gov/environment/animalsAndPlants/noxious-weeds/laws/list.aspx

  Katie Fite
  Western Watersheds Project
  katie at westernwatersheds.org

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  _______________________________________________
  PCA's Alien Plant Working Group mailing list
  APWG at lists.plantconservation.org
  http://lists.plantconservation.org/mailman/listinfo/apwg_lists.plantconservation.org

  Disclaimer
  Any requests, advice or opinions posted to this list reflect ONLY the opinion of the individual posting the message.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  No virus found in this message.
  Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
  Version: 10.0.1390 / Virus Database: 1518/3774 - Release Date: 07/19/11
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.plantconservation.org/pipermail/apwg_lists.plantconservation.org/attachments/20110719/a25f9e20/attachment.html>